Policy & Regulation
Jun 26, 2024
Digital Asset Bank Custodia Challenges Federal Reserve's Authority In Court
According to Odaily, digital asset bank Custodia Bank has submitted a court summary to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in the United States, challenging the decision of a Wyoming judge to grant the Federal Reserve unrestricted power to reject its master account. Custodia is asking the appellate court to instruct the Wyoming District Court to revoke its decision to reject Custodia's application for a master account and grant it a master account. Caitlin Long, CEO of Custodia, has hired two senior Supreme Court lawyers to defend her company.The lawyers for Custodia argue that the Federal Reserve's power to refuse to open a master account for state-chartered banks undermines the dual banking system, which allows banks to freely choose whether to operate under state or federal charter. They also claim that the Federal Reserve's power to discriminate against state-chartered banks seeking to obtain a master account may violate the Monetary Control Act, which allows state-chartered banks seeking to obtain Federal Reserve services to have fair access.They emphasized the word 'shall' used by Congress in the Monetary Control Act and wrote that 'all services of all Federal Reserve Banks... should be open to non-member deposit institutions', to illustrate that Congress intended all eligible banks to have equal access to the services of the Federal Reserve.In early May, Custodia hoped to operate as an uninsured bank, issuing a stablecoin backed by cash and other assets. However, the Federal Reserve determined that the bank was not entitled to a master account in the Federal Reserve System and rejected its application to join the Federal Reserve System, indicating that the Federal Reserve intends to isolate the payment track from crypto assets. It is reported that a Federal Reserve account allows the holder to transfer reserves directly to another financial institution without another intermediary.
READ MORE
Jun 24, 2024
SEC and Ripple Labs Dispute Continues: Key Developments
According to CryptoPotato, the ongoing dispute between the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple Labs regarding the classification of XRP as a security is expected to have significant implications for the entire industry. The case, which has been in progress for several years, is currently in the trial phase.David Hirsh, the Chief of the Crypto Asset and Cyber Unit at the SEC, recently resigned after serving the SEC for over nine years. His resignation came shortly after the SEC reduced its demanded penalty from Ripple from $2 billion to $102.6 million. This reduction was a response to Ripple's legal team's request for a penalty not exceeding $10 million. The SEC justified the revised penalty by comparing it to the gross profit of the violative conduct, resulting in a $102.6 million penalty, significantly higher than the $10 million cap insisted by Ripple.However, Ripple's legal challenges are not limited to the SEC case. Brad Garlinghouse, the company's CEO, is also involved in a separate lawsuit in California. This lawsuit is related to statements he made years ago about his personal investment in XRP. Despite the case proceeding to trial, the presiding judge dismissed several allegations, including those suggesting that Ripple violated federal securities law. Ripple's chief lawyer stated that the New York ruling that XRP is not a security remains undisturbed, and one state law claim based on a 2017 statement is going to trial. Garlinghouse reiterated his support for the statements he made in 2017 and considered the dismissal of allegations a significant victory for the company.
READ MORE